Bob Costas, Another Pasty White Guy Offended By Word Native Americans Aren’t Offended By

, a PC libtard, reared his ugly smugness again on Sunday.  He decided to school everyone who isn’t offended by the ‘ on why they are wrong … including Native Americans.

After starting off telling everyone that the vast majority of Native Americans aren’t offended by the ’ (and they aren’t), he went on to say that their opinion doesn’t matter, and that ‘’ is actually highly .  Apparently, Costas thinks Native Americans are so dumb and naive that they need him to protect their fragile psyche.  So he’s stepping up to be offended for them.

The only survey done on the subject that specifically asked Native Americans how they felt showed 90% didn’t think the name ‘Redskins’ was offensive.  As I illustrated recently, everyone except Native Americans are offended by this name.  Most notably, pasty white do-gooders like Costas.

I’ve also pointed out that in my many discussions on this topic, Native Americans believe that people like Costas are attempting to erase Native Americans from our culture, and they think it’s motivated by racial discrimination.

It’s hard to argue against the claim that people like Costas are against Native Americans when he goes on national television and tells them that they are wrong for not being offended by something that only they have the authority to decide is .

Black (not so funny) comedian W. Kamau Bell recently said that white people ‘can’t say what’s racist or not’ when it comes to blacks being offended.  Ok, if that’s the case, then whites, blacks, asians, etc. can’t say what’s or not when it comes to Native Americans. So … shut up about it.

Costas’ logic to support his argument was to make the point that if we go back in time (that would be the 1600’s btw), ‘Redskin’ was a derogatory term used to describe Native Americans.

So what?

Hoosier was a derogatory term used to describe people from Indiana, and now we wear that moniker with pride.  Retard and retarded are perfectly legitimate mechanical terms that society foolishly decided was offensive only recently.  Can we go back to just 10 years ago and reclaim retard’s legitimate definition like Costas is suggesting with Redskin?

How about if we reclaim the definition of faggot and fag while we are at it.  It originally had nothing to do with homosexuals, and isn’t used primarily to disparage them now anyway.  Yet we can’t call someone a fag without being accused of being a homophobe.  Even though the word is rarely used to describe homosexuals.

South Park explained all of this perfectly:



The professionally offended are destroying our society, culture, and language while stoking bigotry where none exist. It’s time to hold their feet to the fire.



Mofo Politics has a petition to demand Costas change his offensive name.